How is a paper evaluation done in Anna University?

Initially, you must avoid studying with the expectation that you will automatically receive an S. This tactic might fail at times. The following are some of the key points:

• Grading of the internal exam:

Highly unexpected. The outcome is unpredictable. You will succeed as long as you are the lecturer's favorite student. You have access to your internal answer sheets, so you can check for errors.

Lecturers can select results from any assignment, unexpected test, or presentation to evaluate their internals. Never offend your lecturer; otherwise, your chances of receiving good internal marks will be greatly reduced.

• Practical examinations.

If you excel at practical work, you may wind up doing all the work in your group and ultimately receive an equal evaluation. In all honesty, nobody really cares how knowledgeable you are. They don't bother as long as your answer sheets, practical book, and reports satisfy their requirements. The e-assignments aren't even examined for plagiarism or other forms of cheating. They may request CDs containing your assignments or reports, but they won't even get to their systems' drives.

• External examinations.

Some professors who excel in their fields generally receive fair evaluations. There are times when it may even seem as though the entire class received the same grade. You are never given access to the actual answer sheet, so there is no way to know for sure how they will score you.

Instead of worrying about how to get good grades, focus on mastering the subject by understanding it in a detailed manner. Although mastering every subject is immensely challenging, it is possible to be an expert in at least two or three of them. It will undoubtedly be beneficial in the long run.

Anna University paper evaluation is not at all good. Here are some points regarding this:

• The marks given for a 15 mark answer is based on its length and neatness. The answer is not read most of the time.
• Sometimes even after writing a 2 mark answer correctly, you end up getting zero. 
• This happens due to the examiner who corrects the paper has no knowledge about the subject and will give marks based on the answer keys. 
• If your method of solution to a problem is different from the one given in the answer key, you will lose marks even if it is correct.
• Examiners do not read answers thoroughly. They look at the headings, subheadings and the diagrams and give the marks.
• The Programs or Algorithms are evaluated based on indentation, comments and neatness not on efficiency. 
• Many examiners lack practical understanding of the subject. 

Spending money on Revaluation does not guarantee correct marks. As the teachers expect the answers to be similar to the text books and the answer keys, scoring marks usually becomes difficult if you do not mug up theories.