In the GATE exam, you can expect more math-related questions, as well as questions on subjects like the theory of computation and algorithms. However, the question paper is not necessarily set entirely by the organizing institute. Different institutes submit sets of questions, and the final paper is decided by IISC.
Some subjects are especially important for chemical engineers, and this is often reflected in the GATE paper. For example, topics like CRE and ProCon may be emphasized.
The pattern of the paper is mostly determined by the professors who are setting the questions, rather than the institute itself. However, every place has a research culture, and the exam is designed to test whether students are suitable for that particular environment. At IISC, the culture is focused on core scientific research, rather than application-based research. Therefore, you can expect questions that test your basics, logic, and conceptual understanding.
The video below explains the differences between GATE paper set by IITs and IISc
It's important to note that, no matter which institute is setting the paper, all subjects are generally covered more or less equally. So, if you plan your studies accordingly, you'll be well-prepared for any type of question that may come up. For example, in one institute, a question may ask for a straightforward answer, while in another, the question may require you to apply your knowledge and choose the best option based on given properties. By focusing on understanding the concepts, you can be prepared for any type of question that may appear on the exam.
The pattern for GATE paper remains the same every year. It’s a standard pattern for GATE.
This is the standard question paper pattern that is to be followed in the GATE paper. It doesn’t matter which institute is organizing it, it remains the same.
The question paper for GATE is set by a committee that comprises the faculties of IISc and all the IITs. So the difficulty level of the question paper is based on the committee which is involved in the making of the paper and not on the organizing institute of that year.