One should really look negative input to balance out positive feedback. Also look for positive input to balance out negative feedback, because I see neither of these here hyperbole. Negative feedback gets posted naturally, while moderate and positive feedback requires a persuasion *campaign* after each negative one. :) They have issues, but other coaching probably have more(?) Positives 1. Stable and capable teaching staff, with no or few changes over a two-year period. It could change if they spread themselves too thinly (I see they're opening several new centers this year). 2. They are still a small coaching firm, thus the majority of their students come through personal referrals rather than media marketing. This result in them to concentrate on teaching and become more dependable. 3. They do not provide much of coaching edited material. Uses books and question banks. Their issues stems from marketing statements, orientation sessions. 1. Data presented - They say 17/17 got under 10k rank from their top batch. But they maintain 30-40 children in the top batch, this year 14 received better than a 10,000 rank in Advance. The total number of students in the full 12th batch should be around 140. 2. What they claim to give attention to all the students, it is actually happens with top 7-8 students or those who can consistently press for it, but in their marketing campaign it is generalised as though it happens with every student. They are too busy to give personal attention or focus to even 20% students. They are extremely disorganized. 1. They made their students and parents Deepal platform testers. Students wasted lot of time with platform bugs. 2. Despite the fact that they have been coaching for a long time, they do not have a fixed structure for covering a two-year curriculum. They constantly change its order without notice, but show that as if it is after great research. 3. Even teachers are unaware of the next day's schedule. Many time schedule for the following day is released as late as 10:30-11 PM. 4. They have non existent clerical staff. Getting acknowledgement after paying the fee is a difficult task by it self. Integrated classes 1. It does not provide the best of both worlds; but good to saves time. 2. It is more like your child attending coaching, where the teacher is unconcerned about practicals/projects and other aspects of classroom learning. Long hours in a single chapter in a day and overall (some time 30-40 hours for a single chapter). Took long time to complete 11th, rushed for 12th portion. In 12 they started relying more on pre recorded videos followed by lectures. 3. There is also a lack of coordination between school and coaching. A personal note to parents reading this review, regardless of the coaching you choose: 1. Do not enroll your child in 9th and 10th grades; instead, let them enjoy school life and sports. Believe me, it makes no difference, especially if he is 16 or younger while in the 10th grade. Let them develop other aspect of their personality. 2. Keep an eye on your child if he is not addicted to YouTube scrolling, online gaming, or other similar activities. Assist them in positively breaking free from such distractions/addictions. 3. Keep an eye on him to see if he is attempting coaching exams honestly. 4. Level set your expectations after 4-6 months of coaching, where he stands, strategies the plan accordingly. 5. Take these coaching institutes as guiding rails, which keeps you on track, and helps you judge your preparation for the examination. But have your own plan-b such that you avoid negatives aspect of generalized coaching. I noticed students who did not completely relied on coaching got better rank. To summarize: Faculty, course, intent are good, but to leverage it fully student deserve better organized, better paced classes. Provide more teaching less coaching, specially in integrated batch.