Alpha And Beta Company GMAT AWA Essays

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Alpha And Beta Company GMAT AWA Essays is an argumentative essay. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently. Candidates can check more GMAT AWA practice papers.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence about ways to improve Beta company’s competitive position. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered apt.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention their background and provide a reason for ways to improve Beta company’s competitive position. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that, they can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared as part of a recommendation by one of the directors of the Beta Company:

“The Alpha Company has just reduced its workforce by laying off 15 percent of its employees in all divisions and at all levels, and it is encouraging early retirement for other employees. As you know, the Beta Company manufactures some products similar to Alpha’s, but our profits have fallen over the last few years. To improve Beta’s competitive position, we should try to hire a significant number of Alpha’s former workers, since these experienced workers can provide valuable information about Alpha’s successful methods, will require little training, and will be particularly motivated to compete against Alpha.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

One of the directors of Beta Company contends that to improve its competitive position it should hire a significant number of former Alpha Company employees who have recently retired or been laid off. The reason provided behind this is that Alpha fabricates a few items like Beta's. And previous Alpha representatives would be capable and need little preparation, could give significant data about Alpha's effective techniques and would be especially motivated to go up against Alpha. Initially, the statement appears to be a strong argument, though there are a couple of suspicions with which the director of Beta Company has concluded. Henceforth, I find the argument defective and unconvincing.

First of all, the director affirms that recruiting Alpha's previous workers would be profitable to Beta. He/She is assuming that what they have to bring to the table is superior to what the representatives at Beta are putting on the table. These recently recruited employees could likely gain more from this present organization's workers than the other way around. This is an unreasonable assumption that won't just prove expensive to the business yet additionally be inadequate. In addition, the presumption that these previous employees of Alpha's would need to compete with Alpha is a weak one. It is possible that there could be various conceivable outcomes where these laborers left the organization satisfied. Moreover, the director believes that the previous Alpha representatives recruited by Beta will be very much prepared and talented. However, during a lay-off, the best and most experienced representatives are always the last to be laid off. By following the chief's recommendation, Beta would presumably be recruiting Alpha's most unproductive and least experienced workers, the individuals who might be least significant to Beta.

Second, the director expects that Alpha is in a superior competitive position than Beta. In case Beta is competing with an organization whose nature of work is below that of Beta, its performance will decrease. And this will make its customers look in different ways where they could possibly discover better items. If an organization sees itself as equipped, it should compete with those that deserve competing. Moreover, the director expects that Alpha is the lone organization going up against this business venture when numerous others excel because of Beta's limited core interest. Despite what might be expected, the way that Alpha has laid off 15% of its workers in each division and at each level recommends that Alpha's techniques might have been ineffective and that scaling down had become important for the organization to limit financial misfortunes. So the claim that surmises that Alpha's strategies are successful doesn't really seem to be the situation.

At last, the statement that previous Alpha employees would be persuaded to compete with Alpha is inadequately bizarre. While a considerable lot of the individuals who were laid off might be so encouraged, the individuals who resigned right on time from Alpha most likely withdrew friendly with Alpha and would on any occasion be unmotivated to reenter the workforce. In conclusion, the argument neglects to give key facts expected to evaluate it. To better assess the director's idea, we will require more data regarding why Alpha decreased its labor force, what kind of laborers left Alpha and under what conditions, and how comparative Alpha's scope of items is to Beta's.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays:

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Alpha And Beta Company GMAT AWA Essays

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER