Apogee Company AWA GMAT Sample

Rituparna Nath logo

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Apogee Company AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. Through an essay, the GMAT analytical writing work evaluates a candidate's writing abilities. The candidate must highlight the errors and questionable assumptions in the argument presented in this GMAT AWA essay. Practice with GMAT AWA practice papers is the most effective way to get prepared for the exam. It is important for difficult and task-oriented candidates to give their answers in an orderly and prepared way. Candidates must ensure efficient idea presentation in the GMAT AWA essay.

If the author of the GMAT AWA essay tells the truth, it will be stronger. Without such, the argument lacks strong supporting evidence and tentacles. Candidates are required to provide arguments and share their opinions. They must present persuasive evidence against the topic. Candidates should also make an effort to persuade the readers by detailing the different facts and figures of the scenario. However, candidates must be aware that the GMAT AWA Essay demands them to follow a specific format in order to write in an ordered manner. The following format, which includes five significant paragraphs, might be considered appropriate for the GMAT AWA Essay. The process of checking the GMAT analytical score is based on a grading scale of 1-6 in half-point increments. To increase the GMAT AWA score, practicing from GMAT analytical writing practice papers is necessary.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the information mentioned in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can talks about how the company was more profitable when it functioned from a single location. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

  • Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
  • The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
  • Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
  • The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic:

The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company:

“When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintains better supervision of all employees.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The argument placed by the business department of Apogee company about centralization is a very dicey decision. They have opinionated to close down its branches to cut down on costs and maximize profits. They have also added that the other branches are not adding to the profits. The company’s business department has completely perceived the concept of centralization wrong. The company has branched out to many offices till the day, and closing them down will on the contrary be jeopardizing. A company that has worked through different offices cannot function without them, and shutting them down just for the cause of increasing profit is in no way a proper claim. Let’s still consider their claim to be meritorious, it is simultaneously clung with weak and baseless argument. This claim can therefore be not considered valid.

Firstly, the fundamental issue with the business department’s claim lies in dubious premises. They have mentioned closing down branches to maximize profits. But out of all the offices, there are few of them that contribute to raising profits. Closing down those will impact in a worse manner. In fact, instead of closing down the offices, assessing the issues impacting the internal and external factors should be the main motive. The main reason behind the rising losses can be internal factors like sudden hiring, feeble employees, intimidating seniors, incompetent workforce, corrupt management, and more. Or it can be external factors like the occurrence of natural disasters like earthquakes, drought, floods, and similar issues. It can be a poor response from customers, or an ineffectual customer relationship management team. A very common reason is competitors outrunning in terms of prices, discounts, packaging, portion, and more. Based on these factors should the decision of closing down be implemented?

The second crucial factor that the business department didn’t cater to is cost analysis. They have only mentioned maximization of profit and cutting down on cost. But they have not included glimpses of the cost-sheet balance. In the initial time, there may be a high cost-benefit from the local offices. Since the local offices directly catered to the local vendors, people, and market, they could have better handled the situation. If the idea of centralization is implemented, there will be issues with employees traveling long distances for attending meetings, for attending the customers, and also for quality checks at the manufacturer’s place. All these factors will eventually lead to the lowering of profits contrary to what they expected initially. Their basis of conclusion is completely invalid.

The third factor is highly plausible. If the branches of the company are closed down, that will be pessimistic action as customers will not be able to reach. It is because of this frustration they will opt for the competitor’s product. Their method of cost-cutting by closing down of offices will attract negative publicity in the market. As the competitor will gain positions, the scene will again go back to square one where the company will lose profit.

lastly, though the business department’s decision cannot be completely considered baseless as they tried to identify the major cause of the issue. And if according to them, centralization was a legit solution then they could have added more facts and statistics, to make it appear more convincing. They could have decided on a centralized decision-making body instead of an office. They should have also placed their voices on the public’s opinion about the closure of the branches.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show