Aviva Airlines AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Aviva Airlines AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.
In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention baggage-handling procedures that will not advance their goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avia’s passengers. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point.

Topic: The following appeared in an Avia Airlines departmental memorandum:

“On average, 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on Avia Airlines last year filed a complaint about our baggage-handling procedures. This means that although some 1 percent of our passengers were unhappy with those procedures, the overwhelming majority were quite satisfied with them; thus it would appear that a review of the procedures is not important to our goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avia’s passengers.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The argument reasons that the review of the baggage-handling procedures isn't important to the objective of maintaining or expanding the number of Avia Airlines' travelers. The author uses this as evidence to show that only 1% of passengers are dissatisfied with the baggage handling procedures, which is said to be 9 out of 1,000. Last year Avia's travelers filed an objection about those strategies. I don't find this argument to be very much contemplated as it is laying on a few debating on wrong suppositions.

First of all, the author made the supposition that only 1% of Avia's travelers were dissatisfied with the baggage-handling procedures. The facts may show that only 9 out of 1,000 Avia's travelers filed an objection about the baggage-handling procedures. Although a few travelers, who are disappointed with the baggage-handling procedures, might want to avoid the inconvenience and didn't record the grievance. Besides, it may be the case that 9 out of 1,000 objections address the extent of complaints in a single country or in a particular flight. A few nations may have a higher number of grievances out of 1,000 passengers.

Second, there exists the presumption that the passengers, who don't file the grievances, are happy with Avia Airlines. The fact that passengers do not ask questions does not mean satisfaction. It may be the case that the airlines don't have a simple procedure for filing complaints. As a result, travelers did not understand the procedure and were confused when making a complaint. For instance, Maruti Motors did the same thing to a company a few years ago a couple of years back where few clients complained about their product quality yet they didn't make any move. For that, they needed to lose an immense number of benefits because of the negative reviews by those clients. Thus, it is absolutely improper to make no steps for the baggage-handling procedures based on just a 1% complaint since it can gravely hamper future business.

Third, the argument recommends that the number of Avia's travelers can be increased or maintained if the pace of objection to baggage-handling procedures is low. This isn't the situation. Aircraft take a fowl at different purposes like the wellbeing, the comfort of the flight, the assistance of the crew, or the route given by the airlines, and so on, to upgrade their competitiveness.

In conclusion, to reinforce this argument we need more data to validate the factors that influence the number of Avia's passengers. Moreover, the extent of the complaint information ought to be in detail. For instance, in geographical arrangement, diverse planning, flight details, and so on. A survey, which can be effectively completed by the travelers, is performed to examine the satisfaction of most of Avia's travelers. Additionally, it may be a risky choice for that airline's organization to ignore 1% of complaints since they truly don't have the idea about the genuine criticism of the other 99% of clients. All things considered, if the previously mentioned concerns are not discussed the argument remains open for debate.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Aviva Airlines AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER