Because We Have So Deeply Interiorized Writing, We Find It Difficult to Consider Writing to be an Alien Technology

Reading Passage Question

Because we have so deeply interiorized writing, we find it difficult to consider writing to be an alien technology, as we commonly assume printing and the computer to be. Most people are surprised to learn that essentially the same objections commonly urged today against computers were urged by Plato in the Phaedrus, against writing.

Writing, Plato has Socrates say, is inhuman, pretending to establish outside the mind what in reality can be only in the mind. Secondly, Plato‘s Socrates urges, writing destroys memory. Those who use writing will become forgetful, relying on external resource for what they lack in internal resources. Thirdly, a written text is basically unresponsive, whereas real speech and thought always exist essentially in a context of give-and-take between real persons.

Without writing, words as such have no visual presence, even when the objects they represent are visual. Thus, for most literates, to think of words as totally disassociated from writing is psychologically threatening, for literates‘ sense of control over language is closely tied to the visual transformations of language. Writing makes ―words‖ appear similar to things because we think of words as the visible marks signalling words to decoders, and we have an inability to represent to our minds a heritage of verbally organized materials except as some variant of writing. A literate person, asked to think of the word ―nevertheless‖ will normally have some image of the spelled-out word and be quite unable to think of the word without adverting to the lettering. Thus the thought processes of functionally literate human beings do not grow out of simply natural powers but out of these powers as structured by the technology of writing.

Without writing, human consciousness cannot achieve its fuller potentials, cannot produce other beautiful and powerful creations. Literacy is absolutely necessary for the development not only of science, but also of history, philosophy, explicative understanding of literature and of any art, and indeed for the explanation of language (including oral speech) itself. Literate users of a grapholect such as standard English have access to vocabularies hundreds of times larger than any oral language can manage. Thus, in many ways, writing heightens consciousness. Technology, properly interiorized, does not degrade human life but enhances it.

In the total absence of any writing, there is nothing outside the writer, no text, to enable him or her to produce the same line of thought again or even verify whether he has done so or not. In primary oral culture, to solve effectively the problem of retaining and retrieving carefully articulated thought, you have to do your thinking in mnemonic patterns, shaped for ready oral recurrence. A judge in an oral culture is often called upon to articulate sets of relevant proverbs out of which he can produce equitable decisions in the cases under formal litigation under him. The more sophisticated orally patterned thought is, the more it is likely to be marked by set expressions skilfully used. Among the ancient Greeks, Hesiod, who was intermediate between oral Homeric Greece and fully developed Greek literacy, delivered quasiphilosophic material in the formulaic verse forms from which he had emerged.

“Because We Have So Deeply Interiorized Writing, We Find It Difficult to Consider Writing to be an Alien Technology”- is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 7 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

  1. In paragraph 5 of the passage, the author mentions Hesiod (Highlighted) in order to:
  1. prove that oral poets were more creative than those who put their verses in written words.
  2. show that some sophisticated expressions can be found among the preliterate ancient Greeks.
  3. demonstrate that a culture that is partially oral and partially literate forms the basis of an ideal society.
  4. thinking in mnemonic patterns is an unsuccessful memory device.
  5. no sophisticated expressions could be found among the pre-literate ancient Greeks.

Answer: B
Explanation: Although the author speculates that oral poets depended more on "set terms expertly deployed," this does not necessarily imply that they were more creative in general than writers. In reality, the author would undoubtedly contend that the capacity for writing can only improve awareness, vocabulary, and, consequently, creativity.

  1. According to the author, an important difference between oral and literate cultures can be expressed in terms of:
  1. extensive versus limited reliance on memory.
  2. chaotic versus structured modes of thought.
  3. simple versus complex use of language.
  4. barbaric versus civilized forms of communication.
  5. presence and absence of books

Answer: A
Explanation: The author addresses Option A's significant difference in several places. Writing "destroys memory," according to an old argument against it, is why oral cultures rely on mnemonic patterns to recall things. As the author mentions in paragraph five. Because of this, written cultures rely significantly less on memory than oral cultures do.

  1. The author refers to Plato in the first and second paragraphs. He brings the philosopher up primarily in order to:
  1. provide an example of literate Greek philosophy.
  2. suggest the possible disadvantages of writing.
  3. illustrate common misconceptions about writing.
  4. define the differences between writing and computer technology.
  5. suggest possible benefits of writing

Answer: B
Explanation: When considering oral memorization in paragraph 5, the author doesn't imply that Plato's complaints are misunderstandings. And really seems to concur with the claim that writing reduces the value of memory.

  1. The passage is primarily concerned with
  1. criticising those who speak against writing‘
  2. emphasising the importance of writing
  3. assert that writing and consciousness are independent of each other
  4. documenting the negative effects of writing
  5. discussing how writing has influenced human consciousness

Answer: E
Explanation
:
As can be seen from our passage map, E is a great major concept question that summarises the text.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show