Chemical Compound in Shampoo AWA GMAT Sample

“Chemical Compound in Shampoo” is a AWA GMAT Sample. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In GMAT AWA sample essays, the candidate need to write points that bring out the flaws in the given argument. It is important for the candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The AWA GMAT sample essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently. Candidates can check more GMAT AWA practice papers.

In the AWA GMAT sample essay, candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for AWA GMAT Sample Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Sample including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction- In introduction, the candidates need to first explain and brief about the topic of the given essay. They should clearly mention how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts and figures stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. Candidates must include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention the background and provide reasons. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic. This is by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic:

The following appeared in a memorandum from the president of a company that makes shampoo:

“A widely publicized study claims that HR2, a chemical compound in our shampoo, can contribute to hair loss after prolonged use. This study, however, involved only 500 subjects. Furthermore, we have received no complaints from our customers during the past year, and some of our competitors actually use more HR2 per bottle of shampoo than we do. Therefore, we do not need to consider replacing the HR2 in our shampoo with a more expensive alternative.”

Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.

Sample Essay:

Even though scientific research indicates that the compound HR2 is causing hair loss in the shampoo of a company, the president seems prepared to argue over it and determined to not change his company’s shampoo while claiming that the scientific study is invalid.

Three main reasons are given in the above argument. The selection of 500 subjects, no customer complaints, and the competitors use more HR2 than the company are three reasons.

The reasons seem quite valid and invalid at the same time. First of all, the scientist chose 500 people. We dont know who these people were. Their age or previous health conditions is not mentioned in the study and therefore, it is insufficient information and could possibly be invalid to determine the worth of the composition of the shampoo. A lot of people with health conditions and age tend to lose their hair and sometimes, even younger people have the tendency to lose their hair due to stress or some severe physical or mental condition. This seems to make the argument invalid as the data is incomplete. Another such reason that can be added to this is that the size of the particles used for the experiment is not mentioned either. This could play a big role in defending the argument. It could also be the reason why the subjects faced hair loss while the regular customers did not even complain. The size of the particles could affect the value of HR2 in the shampoo.

The second point is an issue and it is that the factor of no customer complaints is not appropriate. Scientists claimed that the prolonged use of the company’s shampoo has caused hair loss. There is a good chance that many of the customers might not have complained because they didn’t notice the change in their hair for a long time. The sudden loss of hair can be caused by several factors. Suppose, if a person notices hair loss after 4 years of using the company’s shampoo then they wouldn’t blame the company because it worked well for all those years. The other reason could be that some of the customers might not want to get involved in disputes. The others could have reached the company for complaints but the complaints failed to reach the company. This could be possible because of the poor customer service of the company as well. This point causes a downside to the argument of the company’s president.

Another point to be noted is why the company’s president is focusing on what the competitors are doing right or wrong. The competition should be about getting better. There is a good chance that the competitors could be hiding the actual amount of HR2 that is used in the shampoo. There is also a good chance that the data of the survey could have reached them first and they might have fixed their shampoo before they could get pointed at. This point comes as another downside to the point that the president of the company is trying to protect. Blaming other companies is not the way to defend one’s own.

To conclude, I believe that the argument is more problematic than fair. The points that are mentioned as reasons to defend the company are not strengthening and hence, are not enough. They are not reasonable enough to protect the current shampoo. The information on the 500 subjects could be a lead to give life to the argument. The other reason could be how the size of the particles is not mentioned. But on the other hand, the present situation has baseless points like no customer complaints or the comparison with the competitors. These points are invalid as they could be dependent on many factors. The point with the competitors shows only the blaming tendency of the president in an argument rather than his research skills, and not replacing the shampoo does not favor the argument of the company’s president. It opposes his point like the study and other words do. Hence, the reasons in the argument are invalid and not good enough to hold the argument with strength.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays:

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Chemical Compound in Shampoo AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER