
bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero
Question: Economics professor: Marty’s Pizza and Checkers Pizza are the two major pizza parlors in our town. Marty’s sold coupon books including coupons good for one large plain pizza at any local pizza parlor, at Marty’s expense. But Checkers refused to accept these coupons, even though they were redeemed by all other local pizza parlors. Accepting them would have cost Checkers nothing and would have satisfied those of its potential customers who had purchased the coupon books. This shows that Checkers’ motive in refusing to accept the coupons was simply to hurt Marty’s Pizza.
Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the economics professor’s conclusion to be properly drawn?
(A) Any company that refuses to accept coupons issued by a competitor when doing so would satisfy some of the company’s potential customers is motivated solely by the desire to hurt that competitor.
(B) Any company that wishes to hurt a competitor by refusing to accept coupons issued by that competitor will refuse to accept them even when accepting them would cost nothing and would satisfy its potential customers.
(C) At least one company has refused to accept coupons issued by its major local competitor simply in order to hurt that competitor, even though those coupons were accepted by all other local competitors.
(D) Any company that accepts its major competitor’s coupons helps its competitor by doing so, even if it also satisfies its own actual or potential customers.
(E) If accepting coupons issued by a competitor would not enable a company to satisfy its actual or potential customers, then that company’s refusal to accept the coupons is motivated by the desire to satisfy customers.
Answer: B
Explanation:
A GMAT Critical Reasoning section comprises some facts and statements. GMAT critical reasoning tests the reasoning, logical and analytical thinking abilities of the candidate. The candidate has to deduce the correct option by finding the logically correct argument or by eliminating the irrelevant arguments.
The statement states - Economics professor: Marty’s Pizza and Checkers Pizza are the two major pizza parlors in our town. Marty’s sold coupon books including coupons good for one large plain pizza at any local pizza parlor, at Marty’s expense. But Checkers refused to accept these coupons, even though they were redeemed by all other local pizza parlors. Accepting them would have cost Checkers nothing and would have satisfied those of its potential customers who had purchased the coupon books. This shows that Checkers’ motive in refusing to accept the coupons was simply to hurt Marty’s Pizza.
Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the economics professor’s conclusion to be properly drawn?
(A)The company may have other reasons not to accept coupons than to hurt the rival company. Accepting coupons may in fact cause them to lose money. So this is not correct.
(B) This is the correct answer. It shows that Checkers Pizza did not accept coupons in spite of losing anything.
(C) We are not concerned about some other company that did not accept the coupons. We are concerned about Checkers Pizza. This is a vague statement. It does nothing to the argument
(D)This is inverse reasoning, and we do not know if this is true.
(E) This gives another reason to not accept coupons. So this is also not the correct option.
Suggested GMAT Verbal Questions
- Kooclaka is a Full Line Vending Business Which uses Vending Machines to Sell Cans or Bottles
- Editorial The Government Claims that the Countrys Nuclear Power Plants are Entirely Safe
- Atrocities Against Women are Always Unacceptable in Any Society
- Academics in Theology Departments Generally Agree that there are Fewer Religious People
- Mary a Veterinary Student has been Assigned an Experiment in Mammalian Physiology
- Half of Metroburgs Operating Budget Comes from a Payroll Tax of 2 Percent on Salaries Paid
- Each Year Carroll County Gives an Award to the Town that has Most Increased the Area of it
- Doctor People Who Browse the Web for Medical Information Often Cannot Discriminate Between
- Brunhilda Economists have Predicted that Our Generation will be the First that cannot
- A Library Currently has Only Coin Operated Photocopy Machines
- People can not be Morally Responsible for Things Over Which They Have No Control
- Kendrick Government that try to Prevent Cigarettes from Being Advertised are Justified
- Ethicist It Would be a Mistake to Say that Just Because Someone is Inclined to do Otherwise
- After a Number of Migrant Fishermen at the Rotunda Beach Pier got Sick from Consuming
- More Airplane Accidents are Caused by Pilot Error than any Other Single Factor
- Smithtown University Fund Raisers Succeeded in Getting Donations
- Household Indebtedness Which Some Theorists Regard as Causing Recession
- Recently Many Critics of the US Government have Pointed Out that this Country is the Only
- Moderate Exercise Lowers the Risk of Blockage of the Arteries due to Blood Clots
- Companies that Dominate an Industry Usually do so by Developing a Competitive Advantage
Comments