Editorial Section of a Corporate Newsletter GMAT AWA Essays

Editorial Section of a Corporate Newsletter GMAT AWA Essays talks about how employees are not apathetic towards management. This sample consists of one sample answer. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer to the question. The sample answers comprise two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description of the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective.

GMAT AWA examines the test taker’s ability to analyze, critically think, and put their own views in an essay in 30 minutes time. Candidates need to assess and find the faults in their assumptions. The process of checking the GMAT analytical score is based on a grading scale of 1-6 in half-point increments. To increase the GMAT AWA score, practicing from GMAT analytical writing practice papers is necessary.

Topic:

The following appeared in the editorial section of a corporate newsletter:

“The common notion that workers are generally apathetic about management issues is false, or at least outdated: a recently published survey indicates that 79 percent of the nearly 1,200 workers who responded to survey questionnaires expressed a high level of interest in the topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs.”

Discuss how well reasoned … etc.

Sample Essay:

Dissatisfaction with the management has been an age-old fact. Most of the time we listen to situations where the employee is discontent with the salary structure they are being paid, or the behavior of the line manager is bitter, or the amount of increment they are being paid is lesser than the market structure. These are all commonly heard facts in today’s time. The author has placed a claim with reference to the corporate that in recent times, employees have started taking interest in corporate affairs. Certain studies have been conducted that showed that most of the employees have a keen interest in the works, and company policies, corporate restructuring, and redesigning of the benefits program. Though this cannot be completely disregarded as baseless, the argument doesn’t constitute proper pieces of evidence to make it a perfect argument.

Firstly, the author has provided facts that are not applicable to every kind of organization. The data that has been provided is, 79% out of 1200 employees have stated their regard towards corporate restructuring, and redesign of benefits programs. Now, even if the world is filled with startups where the number of employees is not much initially. But a major percentage of companies have more than 1200 employees. There are many companies having 20,000 to 30,000 employees and this survey will not be applicable for those - making it vague. Since it cannot be implemented for many large-size companies, it cannot be held functional then. This makes the argument unclear and indefinite.

Secondly, there is no more than one argument based on which the author is stating this fact. There is no single possible way that will instantly cease the behavior caused amongst the employees. There is a regular issue with employees of all sorts where they face problems with the salary they are offered. They feel they are being paid majorly less than what they deserve, and also for the amount of work they do. Moreover, the employees may have chosen benefit programs that are not linked with their departments or interests. The argument is again weakened when the author provides those assumptions and the inability to provide connections between the employees and the management.

Though it cannot be said that the whole argument is flawed, most of the parts are unsubstantiated since the author has provided incomplete information. The argument could have contained training programs or family benefit programs that have helped the employees. One of the main issues, the author could have conducted surveys of different companies having different employee counts. The author could have probed into the reasons behind the employees’ interest in the company programs.

Lastly, it can be said that the argument could have been made strong with proper facts, and detailed surveys. Had the author worked on gaining perspectives of different companies, and employees’ interests about different company prospects, then it would have been a better argument. The work culture over the years has changed drastically. The author should have noticed the changes in the requirements of employees, the change in relation with the boss and the junior employees, employees’ change in demand over the years, and more. With the addition of all these, the argument can be made strong.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Editorial Section of a Corporate Newsletter GMAT AWA Essays

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER