It is Crucially Important to Farmers that the Herbicides they use to Control Weeds not Damage their Crops.

Question: It is crucially important to farmers that the herbicides they use to control weeds not damage their crops. One very effective herbicide is safe for corn but lethal to soybeans. To maintain the nutrients in the soil, soybeans and corn are frequently sown in a field in alternate years. Therefore, in such fields, the herbicide can safely be used on the corn, since the two crops are not sown together in the same field.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) The herbicide has not been shown to harm insects, birds, or other animals that come in contact with it.
(B) Scientists have so far failed in their attempts to breed soybeans that are resistant to the herbicide.
(C) Some of the herbicide persists as a residue in the soil for over a year.
(D) To be effective, the herbicide must be applied early in the growing season of the corn.
(E) Soybean crops do not require the application of herbicides to the same extent as do corn crops.

“It is crucially important to farmers that the herbicides they use to control weeds not damage their crops.” – is a GMAT Critical question. This particular GMAT Critical Reasoning topic has been taken from the book ‘GMAT Official Guide Verbal Review, 2015’. This weakens the argument type of question. In this particular topic, candidates need to choose the option that best suits the passage. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the strengths and weaknesses of the argument, or find the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Answer: C
Explanation
:

This weakens the argument type of question. We need to check the premise and the conclusion from the passage.

Premise :- soybeans and corn are frequently sown in a field in alternate years.

Conclusion :- in such fields, the herbicide ( lethal to soybeans ) can safely be used on the corn, since the two crops are not sown together in the same field.

Now, to weaken this conclusion we need to show that " in such fields, the herbicide can NOT safely be used on the corn, since the two crops are not sown together in the same field."

This will weaken the argument or the conclusion.

(A) The herbicide has not been shown to harm insects, birds, or other animals that come in contact with it. - This statement informs us that herbicide is good with our insects and birds. However, we need to see if it will harm the soybean crop in any way. We are not getting any idea about such a scenario. Hence , since this option does not impact the author's conclusion, it is an incorrect choice.

(B) Scientists have so far failed in their attempts to breed soybeans that are resistant to the herbicide. - This option doesn't seem to lay doubts on the author's conclusion in any way. It has no impact on the conclusion as stated by the author. Hence, we can consider this as an incorrect choice.

(C) Some of the herbicide persists as a residue in the soil for over a year. - This option suggests that the herbicide might stay in the soil when time to grow soybean has come. There will be a clash then and soybean might die. Hence, the herbicide can not safely be used on corn. This means that the author’s conclusion does not commit here.

So this is the correct choice.

(D) To be effective, the herbicide must be applied early in the growing season of the corn. - This option states how to use herbicide for corn crops. However, it does not tell us how soon this will affect the soybean crop which has to be grown next year. It says how herbicide must be applied to be effective. This does not impact the author's conclusion in no way. Hence, it is an Incorrect choice.

(E) Soybean crops do not require the application of herbicides to the same extent as do corn crops. - It states that soybean crops might not be exposed to higher quantities of herbicide in general. This does not tell us how growing the two crops in alternate years might still actually lead to soybean crops dying eventually. Hence, it has no impact on the author's conclusion. The conclusion still stands as it is. Hence it is also an incorrect choice.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show