Monthly Employee Evaluations are an Excellent Tool for Managers.

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Question: Monthly employee evaluations are an excellent tool for managers. With them, employees that are not productive can be removed from the company, and efficient workers rewarded, and all within the space of a month.

The argument above logically depends on which of the following assumptions?

A) Workers do not in turn complete evaluations of the management of the company.
B) Unproductive employees often refuse to co-operate with the managers doing the evaluations, because they see these evaluations as a violation of their privacy.
C) Most studies indicate that employee evaluations have no bearing whatsoever on worker satisfaction.
D) Evaluations can identify with some accuracy whether an employee is productive or not.
E) Employee evaluations are a better source of information about employee grievances than are monthly staff meetings.

“Monthly employee evaluations are an excellent tool for managers” – is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can by either finding a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the strengths and weaknesses of the argument, or find the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Answer: D
Explanation
:
GMAT critical reasoning tests the reasoning skills along with the candidate's logical and analytical thinking abilities. The candidate has to deduce the correct option by finding the logically correct argument.

This is an assumption question, so there should be a spot within the logic between the premise(s) and therefore the conclusion that the proper answer choice must fill. The conclusion or main argument is that employee evaluations are a superb tool. The premise is that managers can fire unproductive employees and also reward efficiently working employees. The gap is: how does he know they're productive workers or not? D, the right answer, states that evaluations can determine whether a worker is productive or not. This fills the gap within the logic, moreover as supports the conclusion (evaluations = excellent management tool), which makes it the most effective answer.

Monthly employee evaluations are a wonderful tool for managers. With them, employees that don't seem to be productive is aloof from the corporate, and efficient workers rewarded, all within the space of a month.

The argument above logically depends on which of the subsequent assumptions?

A) Workers don't successively complete evaluations of the management of the corporate. Incorrect
weakens the argument, there's an opportunity that the results of the evaluation are going to be wrong

B) Unproductive employees generally refuse to co-operate with the managers during the evaluations, because they see these evaluations as a violation of their privacy. This argument is Incorrect.

C) Most studies indicate that employee evaluations don't have any bearing whatsoever on worker satisfaction. Incorrect
Weakens argument

D) Evaluations can identify with some accuracy whether an employee is productive or not. Correct. that's why this process is a wonderful tool for employee evaluations

E) Employee evaluations are a great source of knowledge about employee grievances than the monthly staff meetings. Incorrect

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Samples

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show