byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams
Reading Passage Question
Most diseases or conditions improve by themselves, are self-limiting, or even if fatal, seldom follow a strictly downward spiral. In each case, intervention can appear to be quite efficacious. This becomes all the more patent if you assume the point of view of a knowing practitioner of fraudulent medicine.
To take advantage of the natural ups and downs of any disease (as well as of any placebo effect), it‘s best to begin your treatment when the patient is getting worse. In this way, anything that happens can more easily be attributed to your wonderful and probably expensive intervention. If the patient improves, you take credit; if he remains stable, your treatment stopped his downward course. On the other hand, if the patient worsens, the dosage or intensity of the treatment was not great enough; if he dies, he delayed too long in coming to you.
In any case, the few instances in which your intervention is successful will likely be remembered (not so few, if the disease in question is self- limiting), while the vast majority of failures will be forgotten and buried. Chance provides more than enough variation to account for the sprinkling of successes that will occur with almost any treatment; indeed, it would be a miracle if there weren‘t any “miracle cures”.
Even in outlandish cases, it‘s often difficult to refute conclusively some proposed cure or procedure. Consider a diet doctor who directs his patients to consume two whole pizzas, four birch beers, and two pieces of cheesecake for every breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and an entire box of fig bars with a quart of milk for a bedtime snack, claiming that other people have lost six pounds a week on such a regimen. When several patients follow his instructions for three weeks, they find they‘ve gained about seven pounds each. Have the doctor‘s claims been refuted?
Not necessarily, since he might respond that a whole host of auxiliary understandings weren‘t met: the pizzas had too much sauce, or the dieters slept sixteen hours a day, or the birch beer wasn‘t the rightbrand. Number and probability do, however, provide the basis for statistics, which, together with logic, constitutes the foundation of the scientific method, which will eventually sort matters out if anything can. However, just as the existence of pink does not undermine the distinction between red and white, and dawn doesn‘t indicate that day and night are really the same, this problematic fringe area doesn‘t negate the fundamental differences between science and its impostors.
The philosopher Willard Van Orman Quine ventures even further and maintains that experience never forces one to reject any particular belief. He views science as an integrated web of interconnecting hypotheses, procedures, and formalisms, and argues that any impact of the world on the web can be distributed in many different ways. If we‘re willing to make drastic enough changes in the rest of the web of our beliefs, the argument goes, we can hold to our belief in the efficacy of the above diet, or indeed in the validity of any pseudoscience.
“Most Diseases or Conditions Improve by Themselves, are Self-limiting” - is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.
This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 3 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.
Solutions and Explanation
- In the context of the passage, its discussion of various medical conditions, and the particulars of those conditions, the term self-limiting (lines 15-16) refers to medical conditions that:
- run a definite course that does not result in the patient‘s death.
- impair the patient‘s ability to engage in everyday activities.
- have a very high rate of mortality.
- never shows improvement.
- cannot be cured by medicine
Answer: A
Explanation: There are many kinds of diseases and when they become intense it becomes necessary for a person to visit the doctor. It will always be the doctor’s fault if the patient dies or if his condition worsens. A doctor’s contribution is remembered only when he tries to treat the disease which is self-limiting. Self-limiting implies that the disease will take some time to get completely cured but the patient will remain alive. All the mistakes and failures will be forgotten if the number of successes is more than failures. This is because there are chances that there might be a few errors in one’s career but they should be the next step towards learning an important lesson.
- According to the passage, which of the following is most likely to be the best way to determine whether a practitioner‘s intervention is worthwhile or not?
- Keep a record of the time it takes for a patient to respond to the practitioner‘s treatment
- Keep a record of the number of patients the practitioner has treated successfully
- Keep a record of the dosage that the practitioner employs in his treatment
- Keep a record of both the successes and failures of the practitioner
- Keep a record of the different claims made by the practitioner
Answer: B
Explanation: It is very important for a practitioner to understand that his way of treatment is successful or not. But the major problem is how a practitioner should keep a track of success records. The best practice for doing this is to keep a record of the number of patients the practitioner has treated successfully. This helps a practitioner to understand whether his line of treatment is successful or whether he needs to change his way and approach towards his treatment. There might be times when a specific line of treatment might work for one patient. There is another patient having the same disease that might not get better with the same treatment. In that case, the practitioner needs to change his style of treatment so that he can improve the condition of his patient.
- Based on the information in the passage, which of the following opinions could most reasonably be ascribed to the author?
- Too often nothing truly effective can be done to ameliorate the illness of a patient.
- There is no way that pseudoscience will ever be eliminated.
- Beliefs can be maintained even in the absence of strong supporting evidence.
- Experience never forces one to reject any particular belief.
- Quack doctors should be banned
Answer: C
Explanation: The author weighs science over belief. However, there has been a philosopher who emphasizes on the fact that a medical practitioner should not reject a particular belief even if it is not proven. Science is an interlinkage of procedure, theory and formalism which can be different for a different person. If our beliefs weigh more than science then we should weigh it. If we think that our beliefs could help in the medical practice then they can be used to improve the medical condition of a specific patient. It is important for a medical practitioner to understand where he should implement his belief and where he should go for medical science to treat the patient.
Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Samples
- Modern Archaeological Finds can Still Contribute Much to the Study of Ancient Literature GMAT Reading Comprehension
- It is Almost a Year Since Abiy Ahmed the Prime Minister of Ethiopia GMAT Reading Comprehension
- An Interesting Approach to Reducing the United States Trade Deficit GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Three Basic Adaptive Responses Regulatory Acclimatory and Developmental GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Scientifically Speaking Human Biology isnt more or Less Complex GMAT Reading Comprehension
- A Cyclone Which can Cover an Area of Thousands of Square Miles GMAT Reading Comprehension
- It Is Impossible To Describe The Arts In The United States GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Gastrostomy Tubes Are Commonly Used To Provide Nutrition And Hydration GMAT Reading Comprehension
- The Racial Identity of South Asians has Long been a Subject of Some Controversy GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Economists have Defined Four Stages Societies Pass through Based on Demographics GMAT Reading Comprehension
- According to the United Nations the Total Fertility Rate the Number of Children GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Woodrow Wilson Was Referring To The Liberal Idea Of The Economic Market GMAT Reading Comprehension
- On May 5th 1997 the European Edition of Business Tech Magazine Led with Hoffmans GMAT Reading Comprehenison
- For Some Years Before the Outbreak of World War I GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Alexander Calder Was One Of The Most Innovative GMAT Reading Comprehension
- A Conventional View of Nineteenth Century Britain Holds that Iron GMAT Reading Comprehension
- There is Much Talk of a Hydrogen Economy and One Version of that Future GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Juror Anonymity was Unknown to American Common Law and Jurisprudence GMAT Reading Comprehension
- Most Educated People of the Eighteenth Century such as the Founding Fathers GMAT Reading Comprehension
- There Is A Dangerous Tendency In Superficial Analyses GMAT Reading Comprehension
Comments