Musical Rock Group Called Zapped AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Musical Rock Group Called Zapped AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered apt.
Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention the musical group called Zapped and how its new manager has suggested a plan to succeed financially. In the argument, the new manager of the music company has stated how their competitor Zonked who plays the music of the same genre is far more famous than them. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. they can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared as part of a business plan recommended by the new manager of a musical rock group called Zapped:

“To succeed financially, Zapped needs greater name recognition. It should therefore diversify its commercial enterprises. The rock group Zonked plays the same type of music that Zapped plays, but it is much better known than Zapped because, in addition to its concert tours and four albums, Zonked has a series of posters, a line of clothing and accessories, and a contract with a major advertising agency to endorse a number of different products.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The author in the argument has mentioned the musical group called Zapped and how its new manager has suggested a plan to succeed financially. In the argument, the new manager of the music company has stated how their competitor Zonked who plays the music of the same genre is far more famous than them. It has happened because along with converting tours and four albums, they have also launched their accessories, clothing line, and a major advertising agency to endorse different products. The argument states, that for Zapped to attain fame, it needs more recognition. Now, the argument is highly based on assumptions and the author has given views with regard to a different company. The argument indicates ambiguity in different senses.

Firstly, the author of the argument has mentioned how the new manager of the music company Zapped has focused on hyping up the recognition in order for Zapped to succeed financially. The new manager has suggested increasing the popularity and fame of Zapped, the commercial enterprise needs to be diversified. Now, the argument nowhere provides a detailed comparison of the two music companies apart from the trivial fact that both offer music of a similar genre. The argument nowhere mentions Zapped’s present investment scenario, and also the ROI of Zonked’s investment in recognition. The argument contains very slight merit in it but is not strong enough to stand out as an independent argument.

Secondly, a very crucial piece of information that the author has missed out on is providing Zapped’s present facts and details. They have used the term ‘diversify’ which means they have already some approaches and policies being implemented that require modifications. However, there is no evidence showing the already implemented approaches of Zapped or the range of actions that they have followed. The argument also didn’t throw light on what went wrong in the financial planning of the music company and that they need to follow their competitor’s policies. The success and failure rates are not provided here, which is making the understanding of Zapped’s businesses unclear. If the present portfolio of Zapped would be stated, then it would make it easier for the readers to understand what changes would have actually helped in its recognition.

The argument portrays more information about Zonked as compared to that Zapped. The author has mentioned only a handful of information as to how Zapped needs to succeed financially. The argument doesn’t include details about the business of Zonked ROI on the wide variety of ventures, and this makes it even more complex for the readers to assess what would help Zapped to flourish. In the absence of relevant facts and figures about Zonked’s investment, it is really hard to identify if Zonked experienced similar profits, recognition, or losses. The argument should have stated a cost/benefit analysis of Zonked which would have made it easier for the audience to understand which avenue would have been perfect for Zapped to be applied.

Lastly, the argument is completely devoid of the band’s comparison. There is hardly any information provided apart from the fact that both play similar music. There is no information as to how long they have been in the music industry, what is their age group listening to, what is their fanbase, and more. Without all these basic facts, it will not be possible to assess.

In conclusion, it can be stated that not much information has been provided about Zapped music company and that makes it hard for the audience to assess its business. The argument should have probed deep into its policies, approaches, and Zonked’s business analysis to know what would work properly on Zapped.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Musical Rock Group Called Zapped AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER