New Subway Train AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

New Subway Train AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered apt.
Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention about the commuter use of the subway train exceeding the transit company's expectations, while commuter use of the shuttle buses is below projected volume. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. they can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:

“Commuter use of the new subway train is exceeding the transit company’s projections. However, commuter use of the shuttle buses that transport people to the subway stations is below the projected volume. If the transit company expects commuters to ride the shuttle buses to the subway rather than drive there, it must either reduce the shuttle bus fares or increase the price of parking at the subway stations.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The argument claims that the number of passengers using the shuttle bus is less than usual. Subsequently, the travel organization should reduce bus fares and increase parking spaces in subway stations to promote their business. Expressed in this manner, the argument neglects to specify a few key components, which may be assessed very well. The conclusion depends on the hypothesis for which there is no obvious evidence. Therefore, this argument is frail, unconvincing, and has a few defects.

First, this argument does not provide enough evidence to analyze the time required for the two modes of transportation to reach the subway station. If it takes a long time to travel by bus, passengers can lean on their own vehicles on public transport. Additionally, regardless of whether the events are considered to be something very similar, the author neglects to specify the timetable and recurrence of the shuttle buses which may be one of the essential concerns for the commuters. The reasoning might be clearer if it specifically mentions the evidence of observing the time of the two modes of transportation.

Second, the author refuses to examine the absolute fare paid by commuters when traveling by bus. The total fare is the fare in addition to the bus stop fare. The author did not state that the overall discounted fare will eventually be lower than the personal transportation cost. Also, regardless of whether the expense caused through bus transport is a little lower than the private vehicle, a few people may still be very well inclined toward utilizing their own vehicle for hassle-free and convenient travel. If the argument had provided evidence of traveler preferences and tariff comparisons, then the argument would be very convincing.

Finally, the argument neglects to address a few significant points such as - Are buses as comfortable as the private vehicle of the commuter? Is the condition of buses good or not? How many commuters are willing to travel in old buses when the fare is low?

Without persuading answers to these questions, the argument is just wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence.

In summary, due to the above reasons, it can be said that the reasoning is flawed and therefore unconvincing. In order to understand the benefits of a particular preference, it is necessary to know complete information about all the elements. For this case, the argument can be reinforced if the author provides appropriate evidence to assess commuter preferences, accessibility of relevant framework with travel organization, and comparison of timings and schedules of transport and private vehicle transport.

Suggested GMAT AWA Eassys

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

New Subway Train AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER