Paper from Every Morning Edition AWA GMAT Sample

Rituparna Nath logo

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Paper from Every Morning Edition AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently. Candidates can check more GMAT AWA practice papers.

In GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organised writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered apt.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention how the editorial section of a local newspaper from every morning edition of the nation’s largest newspaper was collected and rendered into paper pulp that the newspaper could reuse, and about 5 million trees would be saved each year. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. they can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

  • Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
  • The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
  • Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons and effect.
  • The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper:

“If the paper from every morning edition of the nation’s largest newspaper were collected and rendered into paper pulp that the newspaper could reuse, about 5 million trees would be saved each year. This kind of recycling is unnecessary, however, since the newspaper maintains its own forests to ensure an uninterrupted supply of paper.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The writer in the argument states that the nation‘s largest newspaper company can manufacture newspapers by simply recycling them. This newspaper company maintains its own forest, which has an interrupted source of the word, and other raw materials that are required to produce papers but the author feels to mention any main factor that can be evaluated in the argument. The argument is highly vague, the author of the argument has failed to provide strong facts and pieces of evidence to support why reusing the paper that would save 5 million trees would not be insignificant.

Firstly, there is no compelling evidence stating why it would be unnecessary for the newspaper company to reuse the papers. In a layman’s vision, it would save the environment from thousands of trees being cut down by the newspaper company to produce their papers. Additionally, it would highly impact the environment in a very positive way. Since most environmentalists are conservationists who indulged in afforestation and spreading the consciousness among people, with this approach, the newspaper company would have actually helped in saving around 5 million trees. The author has placed no deposition on the financial matter of cutting down trees from their own maintained forest and of reusing the paper from the morning edition. Eventually, the newspaper company is causing harm to the environment.

Secondly, there is no indication of the continuity of the newspaper company’s forest. It is nowhere mentioned how long the forest will provide thriving results, how many trees are there, how much quantity is provided by the forest, and also how many trees are used each day for the newspaper. The argument has also missed out on a crucial fact as to how the newspaper company depends on the forest for the supply of paper in case a drought, fire, or plant disease occurs. Since there is no sign of redressal for all these issues, the argument has completely failed to be a strong one.

Thirdly, the author has stated a questionable fact regarding the future of the newspaper. There is no guarantee that the newspapers’ content quantity will not increase in the near future. The world is going through changes and it may become necessary for the newspaper to showcase all the news, thereby increasing the number of pages. There is no information supporting the fact that the present forest will be able to sustain the increase in the number of pages in the future. The author has also not considered the changes in the regulations of the government. The government is regulating strict laws regarding the conservation of forests. According to the argument, the author assumes that forests are perpetual. All these factors furthermore contribute to the vagueness of the argument.

Lastly to conclude, we can clearly see that the author lacks certain examples in the argument that would have helped to provide support. The leap of faith, and ill-defined terminologies make this argument, weak. The logic is given by the author or not appropriate. Had the author provided details about how the reuse of the papers was unnecessary for the company, or about the continuity of the forest, then it would have been a strong argument.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show