Perks Company AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Perks Company AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered apt.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates need to state how drinking coffee affects the human body with age. With the help of the example and facts, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point.

Topic: The following is part of a business plan being discussed at a board meeting of the Perks Company:

“It is no longer cost-effective for the Perks Company to continue offering its employees a generous package of benefits and incentives year after year. In periods when national unemployment rates are low, Perks may need to offer such a package in order to attract and keep good employees, but since national unemployment rates are now high, Perks do not need to offer the same benefits and incentives. The money thus saved could be better used to replace the existing plant machinery with more technologically sophisticated equipment, or even to build an additional plant.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion..

Sample Essay:

This argument expresses that Perks Company doesn't have to offer advantages and incentives to its workers. This conclusion depends on the reason that unemployment rates are high and that funds ought to be utilized to displace the current plant equipment with all the more mechanically refined gear. The argument neglects to make reference to a few key components, based on which it very well may be assessed that the business strategy right now is frail.

First of all, the contention promptly affirms that the employees will not leave the organization after their benefits are removed. To explain, on the off chance that employees leave, this will be an additional expense for the organization since HR is costly. For instance, the automobile organizations that are totally dependent on HR for their finished result. They are not in a state to take such a decision even when the unemployment rate in the country is high since it will ultimately adversely affect the organization's general income. To think about this as a cost-effective choice, an examination ought to be made, on the grounds that it may not be workable for a finance manager to support his organization without the help of his employees. Putting resources into new equipment would not be of any good without a sufficient workforce.

Second, the author claims that the general unemployment rate will influence the area where Perks Company works. Again, this is a weak and unreasonable case because the reasoning does not provide any information about the organization’s funds and staff costs. For example, it is conceivable that the division in which the Perks Company works isn't influenced by nationwide unemployment. Rather the organization has seen an increment in the number of orders, and thus the organization actually remains productive.

Thirdly, the argument concludes that the funds spent on removing the current machinery with innovatively complex gear may be a more reasonable choice than giving benefits and motivating forces to great employees. This is not at all a perfect decision. From one perspective, the costs for the new machinery and equipment may be extremely high, though, there will be an additional expense for upkeep and work charges of the purchased possessions. For instance, Toyota decreased the day-by-day wages of their present employees to spend that amount on new equipment. which was not needed by the organization. Therefore, the additional costs of the machinery ended up being exceptionally costly, and later on, because of a cut in the daily wages workers left the organization which brought about immense losses for Toyota.

In conclusion, the argument is imperfect for the above-mentioned reasons and is along these lines unconvincing. It may be extensively strengthened if the author certainly referenced every one of the significant facts. The author should have referenced that the high employment rate has left a bad situation for any job position for even the good employees. The line of business, which Perks company is in additionally faces high unemployment rate and that everything employees can work with the modern equipment and no skilled workforce is needed for it. Before any choice is made, this load of things should be thought of, not just the cutting of benefits and incentives.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Perks Company AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER