Proverbial Wisdom States that “Birds of a Feather Flock Together.”

Reading Passage Question

Question: Proverbial wisdom states that “birds of a feather flock together.” Studies have shown that people of similar geographical and educational backgrounds and functional experience are extremely likely to found companies together. Not considering spousal teams in the dataset, it has been found that a founding team is five times more likely to be all-male or all-female team. Also, it is more likely to find founding teams that are remarkably homogeneous with regard to skills and functional backgrounds.

Homogeneity has important benefits. For the founder struggling to meet the challenges of a growing startup, selecting cofounders from among the people with whom he or she probably has important things in common is often the quickest and easiest solution. Not only does it generally take less time to find such people, but it also generally takes less time to develop effective working relationships with such similar people. When founders share a background, they share a common language that facilitates communication, ensuring that the team begins the work relationship with a mutual understanding and hence can skip over part of the learning curve that would absorb the energies of people with very different backgrounds. Increasing homogeneity may, therefore, be a particularly alluring- and, in some ways, a particularly sensible - approach for novice founders heading into unfamiliar territory. Certainly, studies have found that the greater the heterogeneity among executive team members, the greater the risk of interpersonal conflict and the lower the group-level integration. Even though it is very appealing to opt for the “comfortable” and “easy” decision to found with similar cofounders, by doing so founders may be causing long-term problems. Teams with a wide range of pertinent functional skills may be able to build more valuable and enduring startups. Conversely, homogenous teams tend to have overlapping human capital, making it more likely that the team will have redundant strengths and be missing critical skills.

Proverbial wisdom states that “birds of a feather flock together.”” - is a GMAT reading comprehension passage with answers. Candidates need a strong knowledge of English GMAT reading comprehension.

This GMAT Reading Comprehension consists of 3 comprehension questions. The GMAT Reading Comprehension questions are designed for the purpose of testing candidates’ abilities in understanding, analyzing, and applying information or concepts. Candidates can actively prepare with the help of GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Questions.

Solution and Explanation

Question 1
From the passage, which of the following cannot be inferred as a benefit of homogeneous teams?

  1. Finding a suitable PR and advertising person to add skills that the founders lack.
  2. Using Six Sigma tools that the founders are familiar with to exchange information.
  3. Evolving from concept to product quickly due to flawless execution.
  4. Quickly dividing a complex task into subtasks and assigning them to different teams for execution.
  5. Reduce interpersonal conflict while making key decisions.

Answer: A
Explanation
:
In the given passage, finding a suitable PR and advertising person to add skills that founders lack is an advantage of heterogeneity - with homogeneity there would be no such PR person. This is definitely wrong and the question is asking us which cannot be inferred as benefit of homogenous terms. Hence option A is the correct answer. 

Question 2 
Which of the following can be inferred about start-ups that comprise of homogeneous teams?

  1. They may take longer than average to make decisions in areas that the founding members are not familiar about.
  2. When they comprise of members who are remarkably homogeneous with regard to skills and functional backgrounds, they may not be able to build more valuable ventures.
  3. They usually do not head into unfamiliar territory.
  4. They are at a far greater risk of interpersonal conflict than an average startup is.
  5. They may have redundant strengths that go underutilized.

Answer: B
Explanation
:
The question asks us about start-ups that comprise homogenous teams. The passage lists many advantages of homogenous teams, yet in the end it describes some disadvantages. The passage says that heterogeneous teams may build "more valuable" startups. We can infer that homogenous teams may build less valuable ones. The option says that homogenous members with skills sometimes may not be able to build valuable ventures, which can be referred as start-ups. 

Question 3
The author’s main purpose of writing the passage is to:

  1. evaluate the benefits and downsides of startups with a particular buildup of founding teams.
  2. disprove an accepted notion regarding the success of startups comprising of homogeneous teams.
  3. describe a thesis by presenting its upsides and downsides.
  4. list the scenarios under which a particular buildup of founding teams may be successful.
  5. submit contrasting benefits of various team structures in achieving a particular task

Answer: A
Explanation
:
We need to ask yourself, why was the passage written. From the passage, we get a brief of benefits of startups, its downsides and many more. These all fits the option A in the provided question. Hence, A is the correct answer.

Suggested GMAT Reading Comprehension Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show