Psychiatrist: We are Learning that Neurochemical Imbalances can Cause GMAT Critical Reasoning

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Question: Psychiatrist: We are learning that neurochemical imbalances can cause behavior ranging from extreme mental illness to less serious but irritating behavior such as obsessive fantasizing, petulance, or embarrassment. These findings will promote compassion and tolerance when looking at a mental illness, quirk, or mere difference between two persons, since being mentally healthy can now begin to be seen as simply having the same neurochemical balances as most people.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the psychiatrist’s argument?

(A) Understanding the role of the neurochemical in behavior will foster empathy toward others.
(B) Neurochemical imbalances can cause mental illness and other behaviors.
(C) Neurochemical balances and imbalances are the main determinants of mental behavior.
(D) Being mentally healthy is a matter of having the same neurochemical balances as most people.
(E) Advances in neurochemistry enhance our theories of mental illness.

Answer: A
Explanation
:
On the GMAT's critical reasoning portion, analytical and critical thinking abilities are assessed. To answer clearly, a person must possess strong cognitive abilities.

The following categories can be derived from this argument using logic:
Neurochemical instabilities have been linked to a wide variety of behavioral issues.
Being mentally healthy can now be considered as simply having the same balance as the majority of people, which is a significant step forward in this field.
In summary, the findings will encourage compassionate thinking and tolerant behavior.

A: Correct
It is the correct answer. This is pretty much in line with the conclusion that we reached before.

B: Incorrect
It is an incorrect choice. This choice is not a conclusion; it is a premise.

C: Incorrect
It is the wrong choice. The argument does not end here; this is not the conclusion. In point of fact, it does not even receive support from it (where exactly does it say "primary determinants?").

D: Incorrect
It is an incorrect choice. According to the argument, it can be understood as possessing the same kind of balance as the majority of people. That is not the case. In addition, this should be taken as a premise rather than a conclusion.

E: Incorrect
It is the correct answer. This is a reasonable inference to draw from the argument, but it is by no means the argument's ultimate conclusion.

“Psychiatrist: We are learning that neurochemical imbalances can cause” – is a GMAT Critical question. To answer the question, a candidate can either find a piece of evidence that would weaken the argument or have logical flaws in the argument. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. This topic requires candidates to find the argument's strengths and weaknesses or the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show