Public Concern Over Drug Abuse GMAT AWA Essays

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Public Concern Over Drug Abuse GMAT AWA Essays is an argumentative essay. This sample consists of one sample answer. The task requires the candidates to provide a tentative and argumentative answer to the question. The sample answers comprise two parts: Introduction and body. The introduction is a brief description of the topic. The body contains argumentative statements and tentative answers to support the test-taker's perspective. This particular Public Concern Over Drug Abuse GMAT AWA Essays focuses on the increase in cocaine use due to increased law enforcement.

GMAT AWA examines the test taker’s ability to analyze, critically think, and put their own views in an essay in 30 minutes' time. Candidates need to assess and find the faults in their assumptions. The process of checking the GMAT analytical score is based on a grading scale of 1-6 in half-point increments. To increase the GMAT AWA score, practicing from GMAT analytical writing practice papers is necessary.

Topic: The following appeared in the editorial section of a newspaper:

“As public concern over drug abuse has increased, authorities have become more vigilant in their efforts to prevent illegal drugs from entering the country. Many drug traffickers have consequently switched from marijuana, which is bulky, or heroin, which has a market too small to justify the risk of severe punishment, to cocaine. Thus enforcement efforts have ironically resulted in an observed increase in the illegal use of cocaine.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The given argument claims that the efforts of authorities to prevent illegal drugs from entering the country has ironically resulted in increasing a bulky amount of heroin, cocaine and more. Though the argument mix quite a number of assumptions, but it does not provide enough evidence to support the argument. We can see a number of flaws in the given argument that we have discussed in the below article.

Firstly, the argument promptly concludes that there is a causal relationship between the authority’s efforts and the increased traffic of cocaine. Perhaps there is an elective clarification For instance, we could envision that the expanded sales of cocaine are the effect of a more expensive price of that drug. So offenders are concentrating their efforts on selling more of that drug. In this case, the author should provide data to eliminate alternative evidence to make it a stronger argument. This argument is based on the assumption that in addition to other illegal drugs, cocaine is less bulky, has a bigger market, therefore easier to sell and earn benefits. Nonetheless, there isn't any reference in regards to how simple is cocaine to market or the genuine number of insights about the business value, the market size, and the fine sum for the seller. The argument might have been much clear if the author tried not to utilize imprecise degrees, for example, "bulky", "too small market" or "severe punishment". These expressions are excessively wide and don't give a clear clarification of what is bulkiness in the drug industry, what the author actually means by "too small market" and how rough is the "severe punishment".

Secondly, the argument further demonstrates that the authorities' works have made drug dealers decrease the sales of marijuana and heroin. Again, that is a case that needs enough proof. Perhaps the dealers are selling less of these drugs since drug producers in foreign nations are having issues in preparing those drugs as a result of an absence of crude material. In this manner, if the author needs to make their argument really persuasive, the person needs to give more proof about the potential reasons for the diminished traffic of these illegal drugs. The author makes the ridiculous supposition that accessing illegal drugs in the country is a significant factor that clarifies how the drug trade acts. Possibly a large portion of the illegal drugs used in the country are not imported; maybe the larger portion is produced locally.

Thus, the author can't infer that preventing global traffic is a reason for the expanded deals of heroin. Hence, the author should show how delegates imported drugs into the market for illegal drugs. Lastly, the author makes assumptions without any details or evidence to support his argument. If the author would have provided with required data paragraph the assumption would have made sense.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Public Concern Over Drug Abuse GMAT AWA Essays

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER