Red Meat and High-Fat Cheese AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Red Meat and High-Fat Cheese AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered apt.
Introduction- Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. they can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared in a magazine article on trends and lifestyles:

“In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart’s Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1960s, and you will also find a wide selection of cheeses made with high butterfat content. Next door, the owners of the Good Earth Café, an old vegetarian restaurant, are still making a modest living, but the owners of the new House of Beef across the street are millionaires.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The author points out that people today are no longer concerned about controlling the consumption of red meat and high-fat cheese as they did ten years ago. The author validates the case by stating that a wide variety of cheeses made with high butterfat content can be found in a 1960s store. Additionally, the author expresses that owners of some old vegetarian restaurants are as yet earning enough to pay the bills whereas the owners of a new House of Beef are millionaires. The author neglects to consider different reasons and factors that may represent the previously mentioned judgments. In view of these missing reasons, the author's case sounds questionable and unreasonable.

Firstly, having a wide variety of cheese doesn't imply that people are really purchasing the cheeses. Likewise, the facts might confirm that the store serves not to have many people that have a unique requirement for a variety of cheese. Henceforth, the store needs to keep a wide variety of cheeses to serve only a couple of customers. Moreover, there is no data given in regard to the quantity of cheese sold. The store may be keeping not many grams of every variety of cheeses and eventually, maybe selling just a few kgs. Henceforth, the author needs to consider the quantity of cheese that is sold now compared with the quantity of cheese sold a decade ago. Having a wide range of cheese doesn't imply that the store is selling a more noteworthy amount of cheese.

Secondly, the author neglects to consider the kind of clients that Good Earth Cafe and House of Beef may be catering to. Good Earth Cafe may be for people with low-level salaries with each dish costing a few dollars. Thus owners may be making a modest living. Then again, House of Beef may be taking into account very rich people and each dish in this café maybe thousands of dollars each, subsequently, the owners are millionaires. Therefore, the author should investigate the sort of clients served by the two cafés and furthermore the number of clients that House of Beef is serving. House of Beef may be serving not very many clients, but since of the greater expense of each dish, the owners of House of Beef are millionaires.

Third, the author does not mention the profit of House of Beef. It could be possible that the owners of House of Beef are occupied with some other business. And that business is the reason behind the exceptional success of the owners. The author should consider the real clients coming to House of Beef and the real benefits made by House of Beef, only at that time the author can decide the number of people coming to House of Beef and if people are worried about regulating their consumption of red meat and fatty cheeses. As the author neglects to consider different reasons which can be a potential clarification for the previously mentioned perception.

The claim made by the author is by all accounts questionable and defective. For Heart's Delight store the author should investigate the quantity of cheese that is sold to come to a fair decision. To track down the genuine reason for the difference between the earnings of Good Earth Cafe and House of Beef, the author needs to consider the kind of clients and profits of House of Beef, not if its owners are millionaires. In conclusion, the proof on the side of the argument lacks important information. There is insufficient evidence to validate the claims made by the author.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Red Meat and High-Fat Cheese AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER