Safety Codes Governing the Construction GMAT AWA Essay

Safety Codes Governing the Construction GMAT AWA Essay is a GMAT AWA Sample Essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently. Candidates can check more GMAT AWA practice papers.

In GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organised writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered apt.

Introduction- Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validaity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention the background and provide a reason for the safety codes governing the construction of public buildings are becoming far too strict. Candidates need to mention the condition of local builders. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. they can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared as part of an article in a popular arts-and-leisure magazine:

“The safety codes governing the construction of public buildings are becoming far too strict. The surest way for architects and builders to prove that they have met the minimum requirements established by these codes is to construct buildings by using the same materials and methods that are currently allowed. But doing so means that there will be very little significant technological innovation within the industry, and hence little evolution of architectural styles and design—merely because of the strictness of these safety codes.”

Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc

Answer:

The author in the argument has stated about the safety codes to construct public buildings and how they are so rigid. The argument further continues stating that because of these stern safety codes they are unable to show their creativity. They are required to use similar materials and methods as instructed by the government. The argument stresses how the usage of these strict methods and materials will lead to a dearth of technological advancements in the buildings. The argument is absent of many substantiated facts and this is making it a weak one.

Firstly, the author has mentioned the safety codes and how with their implementation, there will be no technological advancements noticed. The argument has missed out on the fact that a building is not only built based on the mentioned factors. There are many more factors to be considered like the design and construction, locational supply, the weather that may impact the construction of the buildings.

Secondly, the argument only talks about public buildings and their safety code. But the author has drawn conclusions by taking into account the whole building industry. There is no evidence that states the exclusion of private buildings. The argument has nowhere mentioned that the private buildings also have to abide by the safety regulations and rules. The ambiguity in the words of the author is making the audience question whether private buildings will also be maintaining the protocols set by the government or will it function independently.

Thirdly, the author has argued that due to the government’s safety protocols and regulations regarding the usage of the methods and materials, there will be a deficiency in creativity. But creativity is not only limited to the materials and methods, an architect, engineer, and interior designer have multiple ideas in their minds to develop and make the place look exclusive. The author has not provided any knowledge about the types of materials and methods as mentioned in the safety protocols. The world has seen ample creativity, and if the author would have mentioned the materials then it would have been easier for the audience to understand the limitation of usage.

Lastly, the author has mentioned the dearth of technological advancement while construction but has ignored the other factors. During construction, other important factors like the type of neighborhood, how friendly the people are, location, availability of stores and supermarkets, schools and colleges, all are crucial factors that a building is all about.

After considering all these factors, it can be said that the author should have mentioned the protocols, how they are going to affect creativity, the materials that can be used if the private buildings are also supposed to abide by the rules or not. With the inclusion of all these factors, this argument would have been a strong and substantiated one.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays:

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Safety Codes Governing the Construction GMAT AWA Essay

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER