Scientists Must Typically Work 60 to 80 Hours A Week AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Scientists Must Typically Work 60 to 80 Hours A Week AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate via an essay. In this AWA GMAT Sample, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws. Candidates need to mention the weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.

In the AWA GMAT sample essay, candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the AWA GMAT Sample including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate. To increase the GMAT AWA score, practicing GMAT analytical writing practice papers is necessary.
Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention their background and provide a reason for scientists require a flexible career advancement plan so that they can spend time with their families. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that, they can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents. This paragraph ultimately shows the requirement of many factors in the success of a magazine.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point

Topic: The following appeared as part of an article in a popular science magazine:

“Scientists must typically work 60 to 80 hours a week if they hope to further their careers; consequently, good and affordable all-day child care must be made available to both male and female scientists if they are to advance in their fields. Moreover, requirements for career advancement must be made more flexible so that preschool-age children can spend a significant portion of each day with a parent.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The argument claims that if scientists once had to advance their careers, they had to work 60 to 80 hours a week. So scientist has to provide children with good health care, will also have to reap. Please their parents for a day as a part of it. The requirements for advancement in the career must be flexible so that the children can have a certain amount of time with their parents. The argument seems to be manipulating the facts and conveying a distorted point of view of the situation, the conclusion that the author relies upon the argument that the assumption has no clear evidence. Hence, the argument seems weak and contains several flaws.

Firstly, the argument has only talked about scientists working for 60 to 80 hours a day, and giving up quality time with their families. But in reality, there are many professions where people have to work for endless hours, for instance, doctors. This statement is a complete stretch as the argument has made a groundless statement of mentioning that only scientists or people with a science background need to work for such long hours. Whereas, other employees working in various industries like humanities, arts, technology, journalism, economics, and sociology don’t have to sacrifice their families and advance their careers. The ground rules are similar for most employees, to achieve success, long working hours and diligence are musts. The argument would have gained strength if it would have mentioned the different working conditions and styles of scientists.

Secondly, the author of the argument has stated that the requirements for career advancement need to be more adaptable. This is again a very precarious and feeble claim as the argument has failed to showcase any strong pieces of evidence. To elaborate, it is very much plausible that the requirements provide satisfactory time for scientists to spend with their families.

Thirdly, if the argument did some digging into the lives of the scientists and provided facts that most of the scientists are doing 60 to 80 hours of work, they are not able to provide time to their families, then it would have been possible for the audience to understand. To believe every piece of evidence it is required for the argument to provide some sort of evidence.

Lastly, to conclude, it can be said that the argument talked more about the evidence that why it is only scientists that the author of the argument has spoken about if all the scientists are not getting the proper amount of time to spend with their families and more. With proper pieces of evidence and facts, this argument would have been a strong one.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Scientists Must Typically Work 60 to 80 Hours A Week AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER