Stronger Laws AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Stronger Laws AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates can present their ideas efficiently.
In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention stronger laws and their need to protect new kinds of home security systems. Candidates can also include examples. With the help of the example and argument, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. Here is a summary of the whole article. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point.

Topic: The following appeared as part of an article in a trade publication:

“Stronger laws are needed to protect new kinds of home-security systems from being copied and sold by imitators. With such protection, manufacturers will naturally invest in the development of new home-security products and production technologies. Without stronger laws, therefore, manufacturers will cut back on investment. From this will follow a corresponding decline not only in product quality and marketability, but also in production efficiency, and thus ultimately a loss of manufacturing jobs in the industry.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

The author of this argument has stated that stronger laws are required to protect new kinds of home-security systems from being imitated and sold by imitators in the market. The author has further stated that with the implementation of such laws there will be a rise in the investment in the development of new home-security products and production technologies. If the market is devoid of rigid laws, the manufacturers will not show interest in investment. This whole thing will result in the reduction of product quality and marketing, as well as product efficiency, which will eventually result in a decline in industry jobs. Now, the author has made very vague and unsubstantiated claims in the argument. The argument is not supported by facts but only hypothetical claims, let us understand why.

Firstly, the author has presented a correlation between rigid laws and manufacturers’ investment in products. There is no additional evidence, proof, or argument provided to support this claim and make it appear valid. For instance, there are multiple pieces of evidence of companies not showing enough interest in the implementation of new improvements despite strict laws being regulated. Additionally, there are abundant laws in the world requiring scrutiny, and there are laws that can send people up to 10 years of prison. Nevertheless, most of these laws are not implemented in real-life situations and are actually subjected to leverage, corruption, and exploitation by many people.

Secondly, investment in a particular product will not guarantee extreme success or collapse in the market. Present-day consumers are highly selective about their purchases, and that is also applicable for this particular product. They will probe deep into the quality, branding, packaging, hygiene, and price, and compare the same with its competitors. It is true that if a certain budget is put into a product’s development, it will affect its quality. But that doesn’t guarantee the continuity of the product’s life cycle. This is witnessed in the very famous Nokia brand. In the years 2005 to 2010, the brand noticed a huge downfall. All the Nokia products were lined up for refurbishment but it failed again.

Thirdly, the argument throws light on a claim that a reduction in investment will result in the loss of manufacturing jobs in the market. This is an acutely flawed statement because investment in products and their development is nowhere linked to the flourishing of jobs in the job market. This is a completely autonomous decision and doesn’t affect the company workforce of the company in any way. There is no chance of a company investing in a product in order to refurbish its quality and expect it to run according to its wishes and cut back on employees. An investment budget is a result of profits and not a part of employees’ salaries, as is given in the argument making it vague.

Lastly, to conclude it can be stated that this argument is highly based on vague and unsubstantiated claims that do not hold any credibility in real life. The author has failed to provide proper information on how the industry has invested in their products, and as a result, it has reduced imitations of their products or boosted the marketability.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Stronger Laws AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER