The Sport of Tennis Develops Muscular Strength, Sharpens Coordination, and Provides Good Cardiovascular Exercise.

Sayantani Barman logo

bySayantani Barman Experta en el extranjero

Question: The sport of tennis develops muscular strength, sharpens coordination, and provides good cardiovascular exercise. However, it can strain joints, especially in the knee, elbow, and wrist areas. Despite this drawback, tennis should be played by anyone attracted to it because of its possible benefits to physical health.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's conclusion?

(A) Tennis is played on various surfaces on outdoor courts or indoor sporting facilities.
(B) The earnings of professional tennis players are the highest of any professional sport.
(C) Damage to joints is extremely difficult to repair and may affect one's mobility for extended periods of time.
(D) Tennis is a sport that is growing in many countries around the world.
(E) Stretching exercises, warm-ups, and professional consultation can prevent the serious physical harm that any sport can cause.

“The sport of tennis develops muscular strength, sharpens coordination, and provides good cardiovascular exercise.”- is a GMAT Critical reasoning question. This particular GMAT Critical Reasoning topic has been taken from the book ‘GMAT Prep Plus’. In this particular topic, candidates need to choose the option that best suits the passage. GMAT critical reasoning tests the logical and analytical skills of the candidates. Critical reasoning in GMAT requires candidates to find the strengths and weaknesses of the argument, or find the logical flaw in the argument. The GMAT CR section contains 10 -13 GMAT critical reasoning questions out of 36 GMAT verbal questions

Answer: E
Explanation
:

A GMAT Critical Reasoning section consists of some facts and arguments. GMAT critical reasoning tests the candidate's reasoning, logical and analytical thinking abilities. The candidate should deduce the right option by finding the logically correct argument. the right answer will be found by finding logically correct options or by eliminating wrong options.

We have to interrupt the argument so as to resolve this conclusion-strengthening question. the primary two sentences provide factual data. The last sentence may be a recommendation.

Premise A says - tennis develops physical health in a very number of how + Premise B says - In a method (by straining joints), tennis can even damage health =

Conclusion - the positive health benefits of tennis outweigh the negative physical effects

Possible assumption - Tennis isn't that bad or they will easily be healed or prevented

We are required to seek out data that supports the statement that tennis is nice for physical health although it can cause injury. the proper answer will support this statement.

  1. This answer choice neither supports nor weakens the conclusion because the argument doesn't involve the facilities employed in the game of tennis. specialize in the conclusion, and hunt for a press release that strengthens it.
  2. This answer choice neither supports nor weakens the conclusion because the argument doesn't speak about the financial aspect of the game of tennis. target the conclusion, and hunt for an announcement that strengthens it.
  3. Incorrect. This answer choice weakens the conclusion whereas you're required to search out a press release that supports it.
  4. Incorrect. This answer choice neither supports nor weakens the conclusion because the argument doesn't discuss the aspect of the recognition of the game of tennis.
  5. The argument presents tennis in a positive way, but not without telling us about one of its drawbacks - straining the joints. By providing solutions to the current drawback, this answer choice supports the conclusion that tennis should be played by anyone who is interested to play it.

Suggested GMAT Critical Reasoning Questions

Fees Structure

CategoryState
General15556

In case of any inaccuracy, Notify Us! 

Comments


No Comments To Show