Windfall Ltd - Invoice Checking AWA GMAT Sample

byRituparna Nath Content Writer at Study Abroad Exams

Windfall Ltd - Invoice Checking AWA GMAT Sample is an argumentative essay topic. GMAT analytical writing assessment examines the writing skills of a candidate through an essay. In this GMAT AWA essay, the candidate needs to write points that bring out the flaws and weak assumptions in the given argument. The best way to prepare for GMAT AWA is to practice from GMAT AWA practice papers. It is important for challenging and task-oriented candidates to present their answers in a well-organized and planned manner. The GMAT AWA essay needs to ensure that candidates are able to present their ideas efficiently.

In the GMAT AWA essay, if the author is telling the truth, it will be stronger. Without that, the argument has no effective tentacles and shreds of evidence. Candidates must provide evidence and discuss their thoughts on the topic. They must use persuasive evidence against the topic. In addition, candidates should try to convince the readers by describing the different figures and facts of the scenario. Candidates, however, need to understand that writing the essay for GMAT AWA Essay requires them to follow a definite structure that would enable organized writing. The following structure for the GMAT AWA Essay including five important paragraphs can be considered appropriate.

Introduction: Candidates need to first explain the topic of the essay given, and clearly state how well this is reasoned. The overview of the passage needs to be discussed in the introduction by the candidates.
Paragraph 1: In this paragraph, candidates must put forward the facts stated in the passage. They can also question the validity of the passage and explain them with reasons. This paragraph should include all the key points that can be discussed in the coming paragraphs.
Paragraph 2: This paragraph needs to include the second reason for the stated opinion of the candidate. Candidates can mention how department came to know about the data. Candidates can also include facts and numbers stated in the passage. With the help of the example and facts, it is shown that the point of view is wrong and inconsistent.
Final paragraph: This paragraph should highlight the passage. Candidates can mention the flaws provided by the author and evidence to prove that. They can also mention what would have been different and create a discussion.
Conclusion: The conclusion reminds the reader and students of the title of the article and includes arguments and counter-arguments with examples to support and disprove the candidates' views. The word ‘finally’ emphasizes on conclusion. It is briefed with an increase in abilities like communication skills and linguistic talents.

Based on the structure and content of the GMAT release document, the best way is taken to explain the topic by considering the following response strategies, appreciating positive actions, and ignoring negative ones as much as possible:

Instead of analyzing and exploring an argument that criticizes the writer's statement, a characteristic feature is chosen that is maintained throughout the length of the article.
The entire article gives relevance and uniqueness to the readers by providing reasons and illustrations.
Strong declarative or assertive statements are created with active language and statements of cause, reasons, and effect.
The supporting statements are formatted and described well, briefed with two or three sentences, and concluded the article with a strong point.

Topic: The following appeared in a memorandum from a member of financial management and consulting firm:

“We have learned from an employee of Windfall, Ltd., that its accounting department, by checking about 10 percent of the last month’s purchasing invoices for errors and inconsistencies, saved the company some $10,000 in overpayments. In order to help our clients increase their net gains, we should advise each of them to institute a policy of checking all purchasing invoices for errors. Such a recommendation could also help us get the Windfall account by demonstrating to Windfall the rigorousness of our methods.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

Sample Essay:

In this argument, the author proposes to start an error-checking strategy for all invoices. He states that this would assist the customers to increase their net profits. The recommendation has been proposed considering the rumor that a saving of $10000 has been accomplished by Windfall Ltd by checking 10% of the last month's errors of purchasing invoices. The argument is unconvincing for many reasons.

First and foremost, the contention wrongly expects that the irregularities found in last month's invoices will be repeated in different months and other organizations. This appears to be a stretch. There are various reasons why this probably won't be true. For instance, individuals who check the records will presumably commit mistakes like any other person, knowingly or unknowingly. On the off chance that they do, checking purchasing invoices won't help avoid mistakes and irregularities. It could be possible that last month's invoices were only an abnormality and for the most part, there are no errors. This would imply that companies would not actually benefit by over-checking their invoices searching for errors that aren't actually there.

Second, the argument believes that doing a total check would help save more money. An implicit supposition here is that there are errors to be found, which aren't found for the absence of checking. Though this very well might not be the situation. The facts might confirm that the number of invoices with errors can be found by checking the level at a certain rate. Along these lines, it very well may be unnecessary to go through all of the invoices.

Besides, the argument doesn't reflect the expense of checking invoices. It presumes that the cash an organization would save by checking invoices (and henceforth keeping away from excessive charges, and so on) would be more prominent than the expense for the organization, an element of employee work hours, salary, and various individuals. It is necessary to know whether this is actually the situation.

In conclusion, the argument experiences three significant imperfections laid out above. It neglects to take into consideration that the information point may not demonstrate a pattern, that more careful checking would help in saving more cash, and that the expense of checking invoices is not exactly the money saved. The argument would be better resolved if based on a time of information that could assist with setting up a pattern. It would also help to understand the expense for the organization for checking invoices. Ultimately, the argument needs to investigate the details in the different kinds of businesses its customers are into compared with Windfall, Ltd. It may very well be the case that Windfall, Ltd. is in a business domain in which this policy may be useful, however, it probably won't be the situation for other businesses like Airplane Manufacturing.

Suggested GMAT AWA Essays

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

Windfall Ltd - Invoice Checking AWA GMAT Sample

Fees Structure

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER