AKTU Faculty

The course is difficult, for commerce student, 1st sem was easy because the subjects were same as the 12th class, 2nd sem was average difficult but students failed in both sem. Good aspects, practical and theory goes side by side, bad aspects, management students has to do coding in python for 3rd sem which becomes very difficult. 2 sem end exams only One is may and one in December Almost 5 lectures a day and usually in higher sems, we don't get free time Teaching methodology is traditional only from books and assignments are also with traditional method. I admire my faculty for economics as they have complete knowledge of their subjects, students had a great result in eco subject The mandatory attendance is 67.7 percent. If we fail to do so, its a bond filling process

1. The academic rigor is quite high. There are continuous evaluations and presentations which keep the students on their toes and they get little time to relax during the course. Generally students do not fail unless they perform miserably. Also there are makeup exams to help the students pass even if they score an F. 2. Good aspect is that the curriculum keeps students on their toes. Little time to relax helps student learn time management and how to prioritize things accordingly. Bad aspect is sleep cycle gets disturbed a lot but eventually this prepared for the trough situations that you might face in corporate later on. Eventually time management is the key. 3. 3 end term exams and multiple quizzes as there is continuous evaluation 4. Generally on average 4 classes take place every day in 1st year. In 2nd year the average number of classes decreases considerably. Timings are quite varied but they happen in the 8:30 AM to 9 PM slot. Apart from classes people might get free time as per their preferences as most of the students are involved in club/committee. project work post classes. 5. Mostly teaching methodology is case study based. 6. I admire Abhishek Sir of Marketing and Prantosh Sir of Strategy as they both have their unique styles of teaching which generally resonated a lot with the masses. 7. The mandatory attendance rule is of 80% for each subject. If you don't fulfill the attendance criteria you get a grade loss.

The course curriculum is quite easy, not so difficult. It was prescribed by SCERT itself. Yes students do fail in the exams if not secured minimum marks. Good aspects of this course are you gain knowledge, skills, confidence to speak, participate in various activities and social interaction too. It also provide hand on experience by giving 30-35 days training in school. The bas aspect is, it is also based on the the old school education system to give exams which I personally don't like and u have to submit various files of all subjects. Although it is a good practise to gain the experience but it is somewhat burdensome. There are 3 exams conducted in a year-2 internals and 1 term end with 10 subjects each. 8 classes take place usually in a day with 45-50 minutes each. As such no free time is given except lunch break which is of 20-25 minutes. Every teacher has its own methodology to teach. Some use lecture method, some uses discussion method and some uses demonstration method according to the topic and subject. I personally admire all the faculties as they do work wholeheartedly to teach us. All the teachers are best according to my opinion. Yes there is a mandatory attendance rule. You have to maintain atleast 75 percent attendance in a year to qualify for the exams. If you don't fulfil the criteria, then you have to come to colleges in preparatory leaves to complete the attendance. Yes I have seen students coming to college because of short of attendance. And regularly or monthly, students were given short of attendance forms to get it signed by parents and they have to secure the 75 percent criteria of attendance.

Course curriculum is not difficult but if you don't study at all you can fail also. classes are 5 days a week and mostly all faculties hold a PHD degree, there is 75% attendance criteria, if you don't full fill the attendance criteria you will be not able to sit in the exams.

The course is difficult, for commerce student, 1st sem was easy because the subjects were same as the 12th class, 2nd sem was average difficult but students failed in both sem. Good aspects, practical and theory goes side by side, bad aspects, management students has to do coding in python for 3rd sem which becomes very difficult. 2 sem end exams only One is may and one in December Almost 5 lectures a day and usually in higher sems, we don't get free time Teaching methodology is traditional only from books and assignments are also with traditional method. I admire my faculty for economics as they have complete knowledge of their subjects, students had a great result in eco subject The mandatory attendance is 67.7 percent. If we fail to do so, its a bond filling process

1. The academic rigor is quite high. There are continuous evaluations and presentations which keep the students on their toes and they get little time to relax during the course. Generally students do not fail unless they perform miserably. Also there are makeup exams to help the students pass even if they score an F. 2. Good aspect is that the curriculum keeps students on their toes. Little time to relax helps student learn time management and how to prioritize things accordingly. Bad aspect is sleep cycle gets disturbed a lot but eventually this prepared for the trough situations that you might face in corporate later on. Eventually time management is the key. 3. 3 end term exams and multiple quizzes as there is continuous evaluation 4. Generally on average 4 classes take place every day in 1st year. In 2nd year the average number of classes decreases considerably. Timings are quite varied but they happen in the 8:30 AM to 9 PM slot. Apart from classes people might get free time as per their preferences as most of the students are involved in club/committee. project work post classes. 5. Mostly teaching methodology is case study based. 6. I admire Abhishek Sir of Marketing and Prantosh Sir of Strategy as they both have their unique styles of teaching which generally resonated a lot with the masses. 7. The mandatory attendance rule is of 80% for each subject. If you don't fulfill the attendance criteria you get a grade loss.

The course curriculum is quite easy, not so difficult. It was prescribed by SCERT itself. Yes students do fail in the exams if not secured minimum marks. Good aspects of this course are you gain knowledge, skills, confidence to speak, participate in various activities and social interaction too. It also provide hand on experience by giving 30-35 days training in school. The bas aspect is, it is also based on the the old school education system to give exams which I personally don't like and u have to submit various files of all subjects. Although it is a good practise to gain the experience but it is somewhat burdensome. There are 3 exams conducted in a year-2 internals and 1 term end with 10 subjects each. 8 classes take place usually in a day with 45-50 minutes each. As such no free time is given except lunch break which is of 20-25 minutes. Every teacher has its own methodology to teach. Some use lecture method, some uses discussion method and some uses demonstration method according to the topic and subject. I personally admire all the faculties as they do work wholeheartedly to teach us. All the teachers are best according to my opinion. Yes there is a mandatory attendance rule. You have to maintain atleast 75 percent attendance in a year to qualify for the exams. If you don't fulfil the criteria, then you have to come to colleges in preparatory leaves to complete the attendance. Yes I have seen students coming to college because of short of attendance. And regularly or monthly, students were given short of attendance forms to get it signed by parents and they have to secure the 75 percent criteria of attendance.

Course curriculum is not difficult but if you don't study at all you can fail also. classes are 5 days a week and mostly all faculties hold a PHD degree, there is 75% attendance criteria, if you don't full fill the attendance criteria you will be not able to sit in the exams.

Please provide insights around the faculty members of your college. Also mention about the course structure, exam systems and marking schemes. Please consider including: The faculty-to-student ratio. How is the faculty to student relationship and how approachable are the faculties? The name of the faculties you liked and why did you like them? Who are the best faculties? The names of the faculties you didn't like and reason for not liking them? How many exams are there and how easy or difficult are they? How many students fail to clear the exams? How relevant is the course curriculum?